Which countries expect a photo on your CV
Photo expected, photo neutral, photo harmful — the map, and why the standard English-language answer is US employment law rather than a design rule. Germany, Japan, South-East Asia and India.
Last reviewed
Almost every article you will find on this question is written for the United States, and its answer — never include a photo — is correct there for a reason that does not travel. It is a discrimination-liability rule, not a design rule. Carry it to Jakarta, Manila or Munich and you are following a foreign country’s employment law at your own expense.
Here is the actual map. The question to ask is never “is a photo professional” but “what does the receiving side do with one”, and there are three different answers.
The three groups
| Convention | Markets | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| Photo expected | Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Japan, South Korea, China, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, much of Latin America, much of MENA | Include one. Its absence is the thing that stands out. |
| Photo neutral | India, Singapore, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Spain, Italy, Portugal, Poland, much of Eastern Europe | Either is fine. Follow the employer, the portal or the sector. |
| Photo harmful | United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland | Leave it off. It can only cost you. |
The border that matters is not language and it is not wealth. It is whether the employer is legally exposed by having received a photograph.
Why the English-speaking market says no
Not taste, and not the ATS. Liability. A photo discloses age, gender, ethnicity and appearance, so an employer who may later have to demonstrate that none of those influenced a decision would rather never have had it. Some large firms instruct recruiters to discard photographed applications on receipt, precisely so the record shows they were not considered.
That makes the downside asymmetric in those six countries: a photo can get an application set aside and it essentially never advances one. When an action has no upside, the decision is easy.
South-East Asia: the photo is normal
In the Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand and Vietnam a photograph on the application is standard and expected across most sectors. Philippine employers in particular often work from formats that assume one, and government and large-corporate application forms may have a photo box printed into them. Omitting it does not read as modern; it reads as an incomplete form.
Two caveats that matter more here than the photo question itself. First, multinational and tech employers hiring into these markets frequently run a US-headquartered ATS and US-written hiring policy, and their recruiters may be following the no-photo rule regardless of local convention. Second, several of these markets still see application formats requesting personal details — age, marital status, religion, height and weight — that no employer anywhere needs. A photo is a local convention worth following; a biodata form is not something you have to volunteer. Supply what is asked for and nothing beyond it.
India
Convention has moved and the honest answer is now “usually not”. For IT services, product companies, consulting, finance and the great majority of campus hiring, no photo is the norm and a photo can read as dated. It remains common in hospitality, aviation, travel and customer-facing retail, and some government and PSU formats specify it outright.
The clean rule: include a photo when the employer, the form or the portal asks for one, and not otherwise. If a placement cell publishes a format with a photo box, follow the format. That is a submission requirement, not a resume decision, and arguing with it costs you the submission.
Related: fresher resume format in India and the campus placement resume.
Germany, Japan and Korea: the formats are specific
These three are not merely photo-tolerant. They have named document conventions with the photo built in, and a generic international resume will look wrong in them for reasons beyond the picture.
- Germany and Austria. The Bewerbungsfoto is a normal and usually professionally taken part of a Bewerbung. Germany’s AGG discrimination law means employers technically may not require one, and the convention persists anyway; a good photo is expected and its absence is noticed.
- Japan. The rirekisho is a prescribed form with a photo box of a specified size, and the photo is expected to be a formal studio portrait. This is a form, not a resume you design.
- South Korea. Photos have been conventional, and the legal picture is genuinely shifting — recent equal-opportunity rules discourage requiring personal details including photographs on applications. Follow what the specific employer’s form asks.
When you do not know which market you are in
Three tie-breakers, in order of reliability:
- The application form wins over everything. If it has a photo field, fill it. If it does not, this is answered.
- Then the employer’s headquarters, not the job’s location. A US multinational hiring in Bangkok is usually running US policy through a US ATS.
- Then the local norm. Look at how people in that market and that industry present themselves on LinkedIn; the gap between markets is visible in about a minute.
Applying across several countries at once? Keep two versions. It is one field, not two resumes, and the rest of the document does not change.
What a photo does not change
It does not break parsing on its own. An image inside a PDF is an image; the text around it extracts normally. What breaks parsing is the layout people reach for in order to place a photo — a header band, a text box, a side column with the contact details inside it. That is a layout problem that would exist without the picture. The mechanism is in what an ATS reads from your PDF.
Sizing, placement and file weight are their own question, and they are answered in resume photo size and placement. For the plain should-I-or-shouldn’t-I version, see should you put a photo on your resume.
Where this site fits
Every GetFinalCV template supports a portrait and none of them require one. It is a field you fill or leave empty, and the same template renders correctly either way — which is the property that lets you keep one document and produce both versions of it, rather than maintaining two.
The templates built around a photo are marked in the gallery, so you can see which layouts assume one before you commit to it. There is also an optional retouch for a phone photo, and the app tells you plainly whether a model actually ran or whether you are looking at the simulated version. It will not change your face, and no market’s convention is satisfied by a photo that is not you.